Unlike depression, sadness has a productive capacity as a way of working through
To highlight the difference between depression and sadness, it’s useful to delve into the productive and restorative capacity of sadness. Sadness can be defined by a kind of internal movement. Sadness is most often (though not always) a response to loss, disappointment, mistreatment, or unkindness. With a loss like a breakup or being laid off, the movement is in adjusting from being in a relationship or a job and moving through to a new state wherein we’re no longer in that relationship or position. Even with mistreatment, we’re sad (rather than angry) when that mistreatment is at odds with how we expected to be treated. For instance, we tend not to be sad when a stranger is unkind. We’re more likely to be sad when it’s a friend or someone we expected to treat us well.
In this way, sadness is about transition—a feeling that accompanies the movement of cells that must come with a meaningful change in our realities. We see sadness in a breakup or a death as a part of coming towards a state of being without this person. However, we also see it in a loss of childhood (like a child no longer asking for a bedtime story) or giving up an old way of being that no longer serves us but was meaningful. Sadness is a way of working through—more synonymous with grief and mourning than depression. In fact, grief and sadness can be thought of as twins.
Perhaps because of this productive aspect of sadness, people rarely seek therapy for sadness. Sadness is seen as both an ordinary state and one that can be worked through (and is, therefore, temporary). Though if there is much to be sad about, we can be sad for a long time. Yet, in these cases, it is still quite rare for someone to arrive at therapy with the stated reason, “I’ve been quite sad for a long time.” Even when they do, we discover something else is going on—they’re less sad than stuck in a kind of pre-sadness.